Doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019285

From WikiComments
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Target Article[edit | edit source]

Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?; Hutton, C., T. Wagener, J. Freer, D. Han, C. Duffy, and B. Arheimer ; Water Resour. Res.; 2016; https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019285

Article providing comments[edit | edit source]

Comment on “Most computational hydrology is not reproducible, so is it really science?” by Christopher Hutton et al.; Añel, Juan A.; ; Water Resources Research; 2017-3-01 https://doi.org/10.1002/2016wr020190

Summary[edit | edit source]

Note: Opened to append information.

Retrieved from "https://wikicomments.org/index.php?title=Doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019285&oldid=102"