Doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001019
Revision as of 04:41, 18 August 2022 by 187.21.138.9 (talk) (Created page with "== Target Article == Do geochemical estimates of sediment focusing pass the sediment test in the equatorial Pacific?; Lyle, M., N. Mitchell, N. Pisias, A. Mix, J. I. Martinez, and A. Paytan; Paleoceanography; 2005; https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001019 == Article providing comments == Comment on “Do geochemical estimates of sediment focusing pass the sediment test in the equatorial Pacific?” by M. Lyle et al.; COMMENTARY; Francois, Roger; Frank, Martin; Rutgers van de...")
Target Article[edit | edit source]
Do geochemical estimates of sediment focusing pass the sediment test in the equatorial Pacific?; Lyle, M., N. Mitchell, N. Pisias, A. Mix, J. I. Martinez, and A. Paytan; Paleoceanography; 2005; https://doi.org/10.1029/2004PA001019
Article providing comments[edit | edit source]
Comment on “Do geochemical estimates of sediment focusing pass the sediment test in the equatorial Pacific?” by M. Lyle et al.; COMMENTARY; Francois, Roger; Frank, Martin; Rutgers van der Loeff, Michiel; Bacon, Michael P.; Geibert, Walter; Kienast, Stephanie; Anderson, Robert F.; Bradtmiller, Louisa; Chase, Zanna; Henderson, Gideon; Marca; Paleoceanography; 2007-3-01 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005pa001235
Summary[edit | edit source]
Note: Opened to append information.