Doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002270
Revision as of 04:30, 18 August 2022 by 187.21.138.9 (talk) (Created page with "== Target Article == Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden; Bindler, R., M. Klarqvist, J. Klaminder, and J. Förster ; Global Biogeochemical Cycles; 2004; https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002270 == Article providing comments == Comment on “Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute depositi...")
Target Article[edit | edit source]
Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden; Bindler, R., M. Klarqvist, J. Klaminder, and J. Förster ; Global Biogeochemical Cycles; 2004; https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GB002270
Article providing comments[edit | edit source]
Comment on “Does within-bog spatial variability of mercury and lead constrain reconstructions of absolute deposition rates from single peat records? The example of Store Mosse, Sweden,” by Richard Bindler, Malin Klarqvist, Jonatan Klaminder, and Johannes; COMMENTARY; Shotyk, William; ; Global Biogeochemical Cycles; 2006-6-01 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005gb002528
Summary[edit | edit source]
Note: Opened to append information.