Doi.org/10.1029/00EO00216
Revision as of 04:14, 18 August 2022 by 187.21.138.9 (talk) (Created page with "== Target Article == Which one is correct, 2000 or 2001? How about 1995?; Veronis, G. ; Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union; 2000; https://doi.org/10.1029/00EO00216 == Article providing comments == Comment [on “Which one is correct, 2000 or 2001? How about 1995?”]; Godsden, Michael; ; Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union; 2000-11-7 https://doi.org/10.1029/eo081i045p00532-01 == Summary == Note: Opened to append information.")
Target Article[edit | edit source]
Which one is correct, 2000 or 2001? How about 1995?; Veronis, G. ; Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union; 2000; https://doi.org/10.1029/00EO00216
Article providing comments[edit | edit source]
Comment [on “Which one is correct, 2000 or 2001? How about 1995?”]; Godsden, Michael; ; Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union; 2000-11-7 https://doi.org/10.1029/eo081i045p00532-01
Summary[edit | edit source]
Note: Opened to append information.